EWC Guest Lecture Logo

Analyzing Your Assignment - PSYC 353 Case Study

Your Assignment for This Thread:

Here is the basic question that you are trying to answer in this thread or whenever you analyze a writing assignment: What must my paper contain in order to meet all of my professor's expectations?

Here are your instructor's assignment directions:


Assignment Directions
Case Study Analysis
video thumb
Purpose: To familiarize you with the case study—the process used by psychologists to diagnosis psychological illness. By completing this assignment, you will learn how psychologists analyze a client based on research, current law and current DSM categories and then communicate their findings.
  

Your case study will be given to you one month before the due date.  Your analysis should contain three sections set off by subheadings.

Section 1: Presenting Complaint and Personal History. Begin with a description of why the patient has come in for treatment. List specific behaviors and the history of symptoms. This section should also describe the patient’s personal, familial, marital, educational and work history.


Important Note: Information for this section will come from the case you are given. Do not directly quote the information you are given. Instead, paraphrase (put into your own wording) the information from the case study. For instructions on how to paraphrase, please see this lesson on "How to Paraphrase."  

Section 2: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis. Divide this section into two subsections with their own subheadings.


Diagnosis. Use class readings and the DSM website to make a diagnosis based upon and supported by the current DSM. Include the DSM criteria and matching symptoms and their duration. Support your diagnosis with specific evidence from Section One of your paper.

Treatment & Prognosis. Discuss how you would typically treat the illness you have diagnosed and what you project the patient’s outcome will be. Use the textbook and other research to identify treatment options and prognosis projections. Support each with scientific evidence.

Section 3: Discussion. To demonstrate your critical thinking in this area, discuss at least three (3) theoretical perspectives underlying your diagnosis and treatment. Theoretical perspectives will be covered dureing the first two weeks of the course. Using sources, discuss the etiology and treatment of the disorder according to the three perspectives you choose:

Theorectical Perspective 1: etiology & treatment
Theorectical Perspective 2: etiology & treatment
Theorectical Perspective 3: etiology & treatment

Sources: When writing this case study analysis, you must consult at least three peer-reviewed (refereed) journal articles that reference the current DSM, which means that the articles must be published after 2014. The articles must be data-driven experiments. No reviews of literature or other types of articles should be used even if they appear in a peer-reviewed journal. You must read the full-text of the article. The abstract alone is not sufficient. Resource: How to Find Sources Using UMUC Library's OneSearch. 


These peer-reviewed journal articles should be used to support your discussion of diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and theoretical perspectives. You may also include your class text as a source.


Length: 1250-2000 words, not including title page and reference page.
Citation Style: APA for in-text citations and reference list citations.




Assignment

After reading the directions closely, please do the following: Write a starter outline and submit it for review to the related discussion board. Please follow your professor's very specific instructions above. Your paper must contain each of those sections.